AFew school practices are as familiar, or as disputed, as homework. Parents argue about it, teachers set it in very different amounts, and some schools have recently abolished it for younger pupils altogether. Researchers, too, disagree about its value, partly because “homework” covers everything from ten minutes of spelling practice to a project that takes a whole weekend.
BThe educational psychologist Dr Ana Ferreira has spent several years reviewing studies of homework and achievement. Her conclusion is that the link between the two depends strongly on age. For teenagers, she finds a clear connection between moderate amounts of homework and better results, but for children in their first years of primary school the connection is weak or absent. She warns, however, that even for older students the benefits stop growing after a certain point: students who spend very long hours on homework do not, on average, do better than those who spend a moderate amount.
CMartin Osei, a secondary school head teacher, believes the debate focuses too much on quantity. In his school, teachers were asked to set fewer tasks but to explain the purpose of each one and to give feedback on all of them. He says that students now complete their homework more reliably, although he admits that he has no data yet to show whether their exam results have improved.
DFor the sociologist Professor Lena Brandt, the most important question is fairness. Homework, she argues, assumes that every child has a quiet place to work, access to the internet and an adult who can help. Children from poorer homes are less likely to have these advantages, so homework may widen the gap between them and their classmates. She proposes that schools run supervised homework clubs after lessons, where all pupils have the same support.
ENot everyone accepts this solution. The education writer Paul Ridley questions whether homework clubs would solve the problem, pointing out that the pupils who most need them are often the least likely to attend. He also defends homework for a different reason: in his view, it teaches young people to organise their time and work independently, skills that matter at university and at work but are rarely measured in tests.
FFerreira agrees with Ridley that these skills are valuable, but she doubts that long assignments are the best way to develop them. Short, regular tasks, she suggests, are more likely to build good habits than occasional large projects that students leave until the last minute.